This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/11993] [3.4 regression] gcc finds passing reference of template argument as template argument invalid
- From: "janis187 at us dot ibm dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 29 Aug 2003 20:17:05 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/11993] [3.4 regression] gcc finds passing reference of template argument as template argument invalid
- References: <20030820130921.11993.stefaandr@hotmail.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11993
janis187 at us dot ibm dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
------- Additional Comments From janis187 at us dot ibm dot com 2003-08-29 20:17 -------
The regression in PR 11993 was introduced or exposed by this patch
(not the same one that introduced or exposed PR 11847, which was added
a few hours earlier):
--- gcc/gcc/ChangeLog ---
2003-07-08 Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
* fold-const.c (make_range): Do not access operand 1 for a
zero-operand operator.
--- gcc/gcc/cp/ChangeLog ---
2003-07-08 Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
* cp-tree.def (NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR): New node.
* cp-tree.h (build_call_from_tree): Remove.
(build_member_call): Likewise.
(dependent_template_arg_p): Remove.
[lots more]
The regression hunt took place on i686-pc-linux-gnu using the submitter's
test case.