This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c/11734] Optimization errors using -m64 above -O1
- From: "gerryt at vcn dot bc dot ca" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 31 Jul 2003 15:44:38 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c/11734] Optimization errors using -m64 above -O1
- References: <20030730205845.11734.gerryt@vcn.bc.ca>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11734
------- Additional Comments From gerryt at vcn dot bc dot ca 2003-07-31 15:44 -------
Subject: Re: Optimization errors using -m64 above -O1
On 31 Jul 2003, ehrhardt at mathematik dot uni-ulm dot de wrote:
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11734
>
>
> ehrhardt at mathematik dot uni-ulm dot de changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
> Resolution| |INVALID
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From ehrhardt at mathematik dot uni-ulm dot de 2003-07-31 09:30 -------
> Probably not a bug in gcc. Can be fixed by configuring openssl
> differently.
You are correct. Configure needs an additional switch.
This switch was not required before 3.3 though. How
changing optimization levels can trigger this behaviour
is "interesting" dont you think?