This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug optimization/11366] [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2
- From: "branden at debian dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 24 Jul 2003 18:49:17 -0000
- Subject: [Bug optimization/11366] [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2
- References: <20030629091921.11366.debian-gcc@lists.debian.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11366
------- Additional Comments From branden at debian dot org 2003-07-24 18:49 -------
Subject: Re: [3.3 regression] miscompiles XDM-AUTHORIZATION-1 key generation and/or validation in XFree86 at -O2
On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 07:45:02AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> sirl at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> > I have no other idea then, 4.2 already had -fno-merge-constants and
> > I can't think of another promising option to try. Maybe
> > -fno-strength-reduce? Otherwise you have to narrow down the
> > bugreport to a single miscompiled file, we won't be able to help you
> > otherwise.
>
> Daniel, Branden,
>
> I see, that on Debian only -O2 is used, not any of the mentioned
> flags.
Can someone give me an idea of what the proper followup to this message
might be? Is more information required?