This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/7881] Cannot compile gcc on Tru64 4.0G or 5.X if gnu libiconv is installed
- From: "goebel at emunix dot emich dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 18 Jul 2003 22:14:40 -0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/7881] Cannot compile gcc on Tru64 4.0G or 5.X if gnu libiconv is installed
- References: <20020910085604.7881.goebel@emunix.emich.edu>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7881
------- Additional Comments From goebel at emunix dot emich dot edu 2003-07-18 22:14 -------
Subject: Re: Cannot compile gcc on Tru64 4.0G or 5.X if gnu libiconv is installed
Using bash as the config shell it bootstrapped, but I'm not going
to install it and test it further until monday.
Thanks,
Matt
And now a bit of polka music by "pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu"
>
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7881
>
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2003-07-18 20:57 -------
> Subject: Re: Cannot compile gcc on Tru64 4.0G or 5.X if gnu libiconv is installed
>
> > Subject: Re: Cannot compile gcc on Tru64 4.0G or 5.X if gnu libiconv is installed
> >
> >
> > Probably a silly question, but I've never tried to configure with a
> > different shell before...command should be something like...?
> >
> > ../gcc-3.3/configure --enable-CONFIG_SHELL=/usr/local/bin/bash
> >
> > Matt
> >
>
> It is listed under the solaris Host/Target specific installation notes because in solaris this is required:
>
> % CONFIG_SHELL=/usr/local/bin/bash
> % export CONFIG_SHELL
> % srcdir/configure [options] [target]
> % gmake bootstrap
> % gmake install
>
>
> assuming gmake is GNU make.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew Pinski
>
>
>
>
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
>