This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c/7651] Define -Wextra strictly in terms of other warning flags
- From: "ac131313 at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 18 Jul 2003 17:20:25 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c/7651] Define -Wextra strictly in terms of other warning flags
- References: <20020820073601.7651.ac131313@redhat.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7651
------- Additional Comments From ac131313 at redhat dot com 2003-07-18 17:20 -------
Subject: Re: Define -Wextra strictly in terms of other warning
flags
> Not clear that this is technically fixed; shouldn't -Wextra also be defined
> strictly in terms of other warning flags? And I don't know if it is yet,
> but I'd guess not.
You're correct, it isn't fixed.