This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: ia64-linux binutils requirements?
- From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- To: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi at yahoo dot com>
- Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 09:39:53 -0700
- Subject: Re: ia64-linux binutils requirements?
- References: <20030718163014.21343.qmail@web41113.mail.yahoo.com>
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 09:30:14AM -0700, Dara Hazeghi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> install/specific.html doesn't mention a minimum
> version of binutils required to bootstrap current gccs
> on ia64-linux. However as I discovered, this isn't
> accurate since binutils 2.11.90.8 building gcc 3.3
> branch yields...
>
> /tmp/branch/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B/tmp/branch/objdir/gcc/
> -B/tmp/gcc33/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/
> -B/tmp/gcc33/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem
> /tmp/gcc33/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/include -fexceptions
> -O2 -g -O2 -o .libs/ffitest -shared-libgcc
> .libs/ffitest.o ./.libs/libffi.so -Wl,--rpath
> -Wl,/tmp/gcc33/lib/.
> /usr/bin/ld: Dwarf Error: Invalid or unhandled FORM
> value: 14.
> /usr/bin/ld: Dwarf Error: Invalid or unhandled FORM
> value: 14.
> /usr/bin/ld: Dwarf Error: Invalid or unhandled FORM
> value: 14.
>
> Does anybody know the minimum required binutils for
> this platform? Thanks,
Binutils 2.14 should be ok for most cases. But the Linux binutils
2.14.90.0.4.1 is a better choice for most Linux people.
H.J.