This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/11376] [3.3/3.4 regression] mozilla-1.4 miscompiled
- From: "kevin dot hendricks at sympatico dot ca" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 7 Jul 2003 16:11:20 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/11376] [3.3/3.4 regression] mozilla-1.4 miscompiled
- References: <20030630081619.11376.sirl@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11376
------- Additional Comments From kevin dot hendricks at sympatico dot ca 2003-07-07 16:11 -------
Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4 regression] mozilla-1.4 miscompiled
Hi,
This is basically what my first shot at a simpler test program looked like but
I could never recreate the problem with code like this and ended up having to
pull in the nsCOMPtr template and related support code to recreate the
problem.
I will try building this case up to see if it can recreate with this approach.
Kevin
> This function calls begin_assignment which casts &mRawPtr (whose type is
> nsiSupports**) to void** through reinterpret_cast. Then, this void** is
> casted to mc0** through reinterpret_cast. Now, mc0 is derived from
> nsiSupports. In short, this looks like:
>
> struct A {};
> struct B : A {};
> A* a;
>
> void** pv = reinterpret_cast<void**>(&a);
> B** pb = reinterpret_cast<B**>(pv);
> *pb = new B;
> assert (typeid(*a) == typeid(B));
>
> I believe this violates ISO C++ aliasing rules, but I don't have a standard
> handy to double-check now.
>
> Kevin, can you please confirm that my snippet follows the code correctly?
> Nathan, do you think the code is legal?
>
>
>
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.