This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug optimization/8361] [3.3/3.4 regression] C++ compile-time performance regression


PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8361



------- Additional Comments From pinskia@physics.uc.edu  2003-06-13 19:52 -------
I can do better then using walk_tree_without_duplicates if no optimizations, I do not have to look 
at all if there is no need to aka no inlining is requested (this is just for the -O0 case) which means 
3.4 might be faster then 3.0.4 which is tested. Patch in the works will test tonight.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]