This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/8861] [3.3/3.4 regression] [ABI] mangling floating point literal in template arg expression
- From: "mark at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 9 Jun 2003 18:30:56 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/8861] [3.3/3.4 regression] [ABI] mangling floating point literal in template arg expression
- References: <20021207125600.8861.catherin@ca.ibm.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8861
------- Additional Comments From mark@codesourcery.com 2003-06-09 18:30 -------
Subject: Re: Revised patch - floating point literal mangling
On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 11:25, Zack Weinberg wrote:
>
> After some discussion on the C++ ABI mailing list, the consensus seems
> to be that leading zeroes should *not* be stripped. Also I've
> implemented compatibility with 3.3 under -fabi-version=1, and an -Wabi
> warning.
>
> Bootstrapped i686-linux. OK mainline?
This is OK for the branch and the mainline.
The C++ ABI mailing list is sometimes a little slower-paced than the GCC
lists; I wouldn't be surprised if someone from HP or IBM jumps in over
the next day or so, in which case you might have to vary your change a
bit, but I'm sure the basics will stay the same.
Thanks!