This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/11099] wrong values for numeric_limits<double>
- From: "gdr at integrable-solutions dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 6 Jun 2003 13:29:45 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/11099] wrong values for numeric_limits<double>
- References: <20030605085239.11099.franky.backeljauw@ua.ac.be>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11099
------- Additional Comments From gdr@integrable-solutions.net 2003-06-06 13:29 -------
Subject: Re: New: wrong values for numeric_limits<double>
"franky.backeljauw@ua.ac.be" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
[...]
| Using the definition,
| min_exponent should for instance be -1022 - 52 or -1074 for the double type,
^^^^^
Where is that coming from?
-- Gaby