This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/7443] [MIPS] gcc 3.0.3 incorrectly optimizes arithmetic containing 0x80000000
- From: "ddolson at sandvine dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 3 Jun 2003 12:15:37 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/7443] [MIPS] gcc 3.0.3 incorrectly optimizes arithmetic containing 0x80000000
- References: <20020730073601.7443.ddolson@sandvine.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7443
------- Additional Comments From ddolson@sandvine.com 2003-06-03 12:15 -------
Subject: RE: [MIPS] gcc 3.0.3 incorrectly optimizes arit
hmetic containing 0x80000000
The bug report already has short examples. If desired for regression test,
compare the result of good_fn1() to bad_fn1(), bad_fn2(), bad_fn3() for
integers in a variety of corner-cases.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dhazeghi@yahoo.com [mailto:gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 6:31 AM
> To: ddolson@sandvine.com
> Subject: [Bug target/7443] [MIPS] gcc 3.0.3 incorrectly optimizes
> arithmetic containing 0x80000000
>
>
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT*
> gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7443
>
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From dhazeghi@yahoo.com
> 2003-06-03 10:30 -------
> Yes. Any short example demonstrating the problem either in
> assembly, or at
> runtime, should be sufficient. Thanks,
>
> Dara
>
>
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
>
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.