This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/10974] Bootstrap failure
- From: "dje at watson dot ibm dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 2 Jun 2003 18:16:31 -0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/10974] Bootstrap failure
- References: <20030525155628.10974.bugzilla-gcc@thewrittenword.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10974
------- Additional Comments From dje@watson.ibm.com 2003-06-02 18:16 -------
Subject: Re: Bootstrap failure
>>>>> ghazi@caip rutgers edu writes:
ghazi> I want to know if someone had tested the patch in both the negative
ghazi> *and* the positive case of whether the structure member exists. I
ghazi> assume albert checked the negative case on his 4.3.2 box. I listed
ghazi> the AIX version numbers of where I thought the positive case lies.
The patch looks correct to me. It tests assigning the structure
member to a double instead of a "long long", but that is what the function
in libiberty/physmem.c returns.
David
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.