This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/10722] [3.3 regression] ICE (segfault) when specializing with an invalid type


PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10722


reichelt@gcc.gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |error-recovery


------- Additional Comments From reichelt@gcc.gnu.org  2003-05-26 21:57 -------
The bugs in the comment #2 - #4 all appear in gcc 3.1, which supports
Giovanni's assumption that they are all the same bug.

Giovanni's last example is more or less a duplicate of PR 8078:
For further reference I'm adding the testcase here and close 8078.

--------------------------
 class A<B>
 {
   int i;
 };
--------------------------

Regards,
Volker




------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]