This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libgcj/5783] verify.cc compatibility fails check on local variable
- From: "toddastock at yahoo dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 25 May 2003 12:39:21 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libgcj/5783] verify.cc compatibility fails check on local variable
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5783
------- Additional Comments From toddastock@yahoo.com 2003-05-25 12:39 -------
Subject: Re: [Bug libgcj/5783] verify.cc compatibility fails check on local variable
These are bugs over 1 year old. I gave up on gcc for
java a while ago. If they produce the same results as
Sun's compiler then they must be fixed...
-Todd
--- "pinskia@physics.uc.edu"
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT*
> gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5783
>
>
> pinskia@physics.uc.edu changed:
>
> What |Removed
> |Added
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Status|UNCONFIRMED
> |WAITING
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From
> pinskia@physics.uc.edu 2003-05-24 20:14 -------
> Can you try with gcc 3.3?
> I cannot reproduce it with the mainline (20030524).
>
>
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.