This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/10929] [3.3/3.4 regression] -Winline warns about functions for which no definition is visible
- From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 22 May 2003 14:33:20 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/10929] [3.3/3.4 regression] -Winline warns about functions for which no definition is visible
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10929
bangerth@dealii.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Priority|P2 |P1
Summary|g++-3.3 -Winline warns about|[3.3/3.4 regression] -
|functions that cannot/should|Winline warns about
|not be inlined |functions for which no
| |definition is visible
Target Milestone|3.4 |3.3.1
------- Additional Comments From bangerth@dealii.org 2003-05-22 14:33 -------
Confirmed. A profoundly unhelpful feature. It triggers on this simple code:
---------------------------
int foo(void);
int main() {
return foo();
}
---------------------------
3.3 and 3.4 warn like this:
g/x> /home/bangerth/bin/gcc-3.4-pre/bin/c++ x.cc -O3 -Winline -c
x.cc: In function `int main()':
x.cc:1: warning: inlining failed in call to `int foo()'
x.cc:4: warning: called from here
Warning about functions for which no definition is visible doesn't
make much sense.
W.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.