This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug 1111] Order matters for inline candidates
- From: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 21 May 2003 17:17:34 -0000
- Subject: [Bug 1111] Order matters for inline candidates
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1111
------- Additional Comments From aph@redhat.com 2003-21-05 17:17 -------
Subject: Order matters for inline candidates
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org writes:
> What about implementing unit-at-a-time for java, I think that will fix
> the bug.
Thus postponing the generation of debugging information until every
method has been expanded? Yes, that might well work.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.