[Bug 10908] New: Addresses of protected symbols don't work right on ia32

[gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10908

           Summary: Addresses of protected symbols don't work right on ia32
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.4
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: major
          Priority: P2
         Component: c
        AssignedTo: unassigned@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: hjl@lucon.org
                CC: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

# make
gcc -O -DGCC_BUG -c main.c
gcc -O -DGCC_BUG -fPIC -c shared.c
gcc -shared -o libfoo.so  shared.o
gcc -o foo  main.o libfoo.so -Wl,-rpath,.
for f in foo; do echo "Running: $f"; ./$f; \
  if [ $? != 0 ]; then echo Failed; fi; done
Running: foo
Data address: 0x8049924 != Data address from DSO: 0x400187e4
Function address: 0x80484c0 !=  Function address from DSO: 0x4001775f
Data: 100 != Data from DSO: 10
Failed

The data address will always differ on ia32. There is a proposal for
the ia32 psABI to address it. But without -DGCC_BUG,

Function address: 0x80484c0 !=  Function address from DSO: 0x4001775f

isn't there.



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.