This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/10888: [3.3/3.4 regression] [diagnostic] inlining failure for allocate in ~vector()
- From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- To: bangerth at dealii dot org
- Cc: 193049 at bugs dot debian dot org, bonnaud at irancy dot lis dot inpg dot fr, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 18:08:38 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: c++/10888: [3.3/3.4 regression] [diagnostic] inlining failure for allocate in ~vector()
Actually I thought -Winline did not work always in 3.2 so is this a "real" regression?
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
>
> Old Synopsis: [3.3/3.4 warning regression] inlining failure for allocate in ~vector()
> New Synopsis: [3.3/3.4 regression] [diagnostic] inlining failure for allocate in ~vector()
>
> Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->gdr
> Responsible-Changed-By: bangerth
> Responsible-Changed-When: Tue May 20 21:59:17 2003
> Responsible-Changed-Why:
> Gaby, do you handle cases like this as well?
> State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
> State-Changed-By: bangerth
> State-Changed-When: Tue May 20 21:59:17 2003
> State-Changed-Why:
> Confirmed. Rather annoying regression, since it makes
> -Winline useless (not that I ever understood its use
> fully, but if one wants to use it one certainly doesn't
> want to get messages from the standard libs).
>
> W.
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10888
>
>