This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: optimization/10877: [3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation with -O3 -fPIC on x86

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt at mathematik dot uni-ulm dot de>, <gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <lloyd at acm dot jhu dot edu>, <gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 13:08:53 -0400
Subject: Re: optimization/10877: [3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation with -O3 -fPIC on x86

Mine is the top of the tree from the fsf's tree:
GNU assembler 2.14.90 20030520

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

On Tuesday, May 20, 2003, at 13:05 US/Eastern, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:

Feeding this assembler file into gcc 3.2 on an Intel box works for me
and the program doesn't crash! This might mean that we have an
assembler/binutils problem here.
Whereas if I do the same, it crashes. So you seem to have a point :-)
My binutils are
  2.11.92.0.10 20011021 (SuSE)
(this is what SuSE shipped with 8.0). What do you have?
W.

----------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth@ices.utexas.edu www: http://www.ices.utexas.edu/~bangerth/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: optimization/10877: [3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation with -O3 -fPIC on x86
  - From: Andrew Pinski

References:
- Re: optimization/10877: [3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation with-O3 -fPIC on x86
  - From: Wolfgang Bangerth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]