This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/2948: different behaviour directly to C++ vs. saving -Eoutput
- From: Sean McNeil <sean at mcneil dot com>
- To: bangerth at dealii dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 05 May 2003 19:07:48 -0700
- Subject: Re: c++/2948: different behaviour directly to C++ vs. saving -Eoutput
- Organization: Sean McNeil Consulting
- References: <20030506015727.3478.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
This is very old and my memory on the subject has faded. I do not
believe that it is an issue any more.
Please close it somehow. Thanks.
Sean
On Mon, 2003-05-05 at 18:57, bangerth@dealii.org wrote:
> Synopsis: different behaviour directly to C++ vs. saving -E output
>
> State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->feedback
> State-Changed-By: bangerth
> State-Changed-When: Tue May 6 01:57:26 2003
> State-Changed-Why:
> This report is already quite old -- do you know whether the
> behavior you saw persists with a more recent gcc?
>
> Thanks
> Wolfgang
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=2948