This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: java/9931: default constructors in inner classes
- From: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
- To: erik dot poupaert at chello dot be, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 3 May 2003 01:58:22 -0000
- Subject: Re: java/9931: default constructors in inner classes
- Reply-to: tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org, erik dot poupaert at chello dot be, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, java-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
Synopsis: default constructors in inner classes
Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->tromey
Responsible-Changed-By: tromey
Responsible-Changed-When: Sat May 3 01:58:22 2003
Responsible-Changed-Why:
I'm handling this
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: tromey
State-Changed-When: Sat May 3 01:58:22 2003
State-Changed-Why:
I tried this program:
public class z
{
public static class State
{
public final static State INITIAL = new State();
}
}
This compiled fine. When I look at the z.State
class with jcf-dump, it also looks ok.
Does this fail for you? If not, and if something
still fails, please upload a complete test case.
I used the current 3.3 branch compiler.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9931