This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: c++/10405: [3.3/3.4 regression] Recently introduced segfault in setup_class_bindings

From: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
To: bangerth at dealii dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,jh at suse dot cz, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, pthomas at suse dot de,gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 10:53:13 +0200
Subject: Re: c++/10405: [3.3/3.4 regression] Recently introduced segfault in setup_class_bindings
References: <20030414214954.6344.qmail@sources.redhat.com>

> Old Synopsis: [3.3/mainline regression] Recently introduced segfault in setup_class_bindings
> New Synopsis: [3.3/3.4 regression] Recently introduced segfault in setup_class_bindings
> 
> State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
> State-Changed-By: bangerth
> State-Changed-When: Mon Apr 14 21:49:54 2003
> State-Changed-Why:
>     Jan, you don't say where this file comes from, so nobody will
>     be able to check this even if one wanted to...

Hmm, I see that filing bugreports via lynx has amusing property of
skipping the file atachements.  Sorry for that.

Honza
>     
>     W.
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10405

Attachment: qq.cc.gz
Description: Binary data

References:
- Re: c++/10405: [3.3/3.4 regression] Recently introduced segfault in setup_class_bindings
  - From: bangerth

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]