This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: target/10326: [3.2/3.3/3.4] regression: relocation truncated to fit error on alpha
- From: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
- To: bangerth at dealii dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, lucier at math dot purdue dot edu, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 9 Apr 2003 05:04:56 -0000
- Subject: Re: target/10326: [3.2/3.3/3.4] regression: relocation truncated to fit error on alpha
- Reply-to: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org, bangerth at dealii dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, lucier at math dot purdue dot edu, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
Synopsis: [3.2/3.3/3.4] regression: relocation truncated to fit error on alpha
State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: rth
State-Changed-When: Wed Apr 9 05:04:56 2003
State-Changed-Why:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-04/msg00202.html
I'm fairly sure this shouldn't be considered a gcc bug at all,
but rather a binutils bug. Yes, there are things that the
compiler could do to make things better, but I'd consider
that an optimization rather than necessary for correctness.
Attached a minimal test case.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10326