This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: optimization/10189: pentium4 breaks suns libm code for __ieee754_pow(double x, double y)
- From: "David O'Brien" <obrien at freebsd dot org>
- To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander at Leidinger dot net>
- Cc: gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org, freebsd-current at freebsd dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, ljrittle at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 19:46:27 -0800
- Subject: Re: optimization/10189: pentium4 breaks suns libm code for __ieee754_pow(double x, double y)
- Organization: The NUXI BSD Group
- References: <20030326130118.8374.qmail@sources.redhat.com> <20030326220934.398c7455.Alexander@Leidinger.net>
- Reply-to: obrien at freebsd dot org
On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 10:09:34PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> And trust me, as long as gcc ships with a description of other
> optimizations beneath "-O" there will be (clueless or smart... does it
> really matter here?) people which will try those optimizations on
> everything
Not to mention bullshit ones like "-O9". I see that all the time. What
do these poeple think they are buying with that?????
GCC should stop accepting -O values higher than what does anything.