This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: c++/10245: [3.3/3.4 regression] ?: operator requires public copyconstructor of return type


> |>     Apparently it wants to make a copy of the return arguments.
> |>     Since at least in Standard C++ (not in Gnu C++) ?: returns
> |>     an rvalue, I don't think this is necessary.
> 
> ?: returns an lvalue if both expressions have the same type.

Sorry for the confusion, you are of course right. It shouldn't change the 
outcome, though. I still think this behavior is in error.

W.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth             email:            bangerth at ticam dot utexas dot edu
                              www: http://www.ticam.utexas.edu/~bangerth/



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]