This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: optimization/10185
Op za 22-03-2003, om 00:42 schreef Janis Johnson:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 05:29:38PM -0600, Wolfgang Bangerth wrote:
> >
> > Actually, this bug was introduced between 2002-07-15 and 2002-08-01. Maybe
> > this short-cuts your search a little, Janis.
>
> Yes, that ought to save an hour or two. The hunt is on and
> has already verified that it's between "2002-02-25 00:00 UTC"
> and "2002-12-13 00:00 UTC", when 3.1 and 3.3 branched from
> mainline.
>
> These hunts are easiest for me to run on weekends, so feel
> free to let me know if there are others that would be useful.
Hmm... Let's concentrate on poorly analyzed 3.3 regressions; it'd be
really cool if you have time to hunt these down:
opt/10087 [3.3/3.4 regression] optimizer produces wrong code when indexing 2D array
c++/10047 [3.3 regression] -fno-default-inline produces bogous warnings
opt/9123 [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression ] Internal compiler error in do_SUBST at combine.c:434
They have not been analyzed beyond "confirmed" (which should have its
own state BTW). If you'll take a shot at some of these, please let me
know and I'll add a note to the audit trails of the PRs.
Greetz
Steven