This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: optimization/8300: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] [sparc] ICE in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:662
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- To: Robert Schiele <rschiele at uni-mannheim dot de>
- Cc: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, tneumann at pi3 dot informatik dot uni-mannheim dot de, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 01:05:55 -0800
- Subject: Re: optimization/8300: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] [sparc] ICE in gen_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:662
- References: <20030316232637.10778.qmail@sources.redhat.com> <20030317050821.GA31066@schiele.local>
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 06:08:21AM +0100, Robert Schiele wrote:
> *(&c + 1) is also well defined.
How's that?
> 1. My rewritten example is legal code with no doubt and produces an
> ICE whit optimization.
Nyet.
r~