This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/10069: -include switch is improperly handled
Sean McNeil wrote:-
> It would appear that this issue has been addressed somewhere else. It
Hmm.
> was a bug in how the cc1plus executable handled switches. That is why I
> gave the patch to cp/g++spec.c that recognized the switch -include as
> taking an argument.
>
> I'm not exactly sure how it was addressed. I'm suspicious that this
> problem may come back later. It is peculiar that c++spec.c has to know
> about switches that take arguments at all. I'm talking about the check:
If the driver doesn't know what takes arguments, it doesn't know
reliably where the start and end of a switch is.
>
> else if (((argv[i][2] == '\0'
> && (char *)strchr ("bBVDUoeTuIYmLiA", argv[i][1])
> != NULL)
> || strcmp (argv[i], "-Xlinker") == 0
> || strcmp (argv[i], "-Tdata") == 0))
>
> Perhaps the cpp initialization now pulls the -include arguments off the
> list?
If there is a driver problem it hasn't been worked around in cc1plus.
Neil.