This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Possible C++ bug: construction/destruction of global objects

From: Evan Lavelle <eml at riverside-machines dot com>
To: gcc-bugs <gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Cc: Loren James Rittle <rittle at latour dot rsch dot comm dot mot dot com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 09:34:35 +0000
Subject: Re: Possible C++ bug: construction/destruction of global objects
Organization: Riverside Machines Ltd.
References: <200303112337.h2BNbx08088452@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com>

Loren James Rittle wrote:

If a standard says or strongly implies that exit() should be callable
in a global constructor, we have a bug traceable back to gcc circa 2.95.

Thanks Loren. I guess there's no shortage of language lawyers here, but I'm also asking the question on c.l.c++; I'll let you know if there's any useful feedback.

Evan

References:
- Re: Possible C++ bug: construction/destruction of global objects
  - From: Loren James Rittle

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]