This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: i386-elf/rtems on gcc 3.2.2

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Joel Sherrill <joel dot sherrill at OARcorp dot com>
Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:55:17 -0800
Subject: Re: i386-elf/rtems on gcc 3.2.2
References: <3E5E54C8.152D3265@OARcorp.com> <20030227213444.GD23752@redhat.com> <3E5E8DA3.F5238F32@OARcorp.com>

On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 04:13:55PM -0600, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> +/* The svr4 ABI for the i386 says that records and unions are returned
> +   in memory.  */
> +#undef DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN
> +#define DEFAULT_PCC_STRUCT_RETURN 1

No, this is not ok.  You should be providing a default,
not forcing it on all the time.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: i386-elf/rtems on gcc 3.2.2
  - From: Joel Sherrill
- Re: i386-elf/rtems on gcc 3.2.2
  - From: Joel Sherrill

References:
- i386-elf/rtems on gcc 3.2.2
  - From: Joel Sherrill
- Re: i386-elf/rtems on gcc 3.2.2
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: i386-elf/rtems on gcc 3.2.2
  - From: Joel Sherrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]