This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Bug#153965: c/8602: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] incorrect line numbers in warning messages when using inline functions
- From: Matthias Klose <doko at cs dot tu-berlin dot de>
- To: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org, 153965 at bugs dot debian dot org, asuffield at debian dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>, mark at codesourcery dot com
- Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 13:37:30 +0100
- Subject: Re: Bug#153965: c/8602: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] incorrect line numbers in warning messages when using inline functions
- References: <20030206003926.19942.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
Not yet fixed in the 3.2 and 3.3 branches. Ok to checkin, if testsuite
doesn't show new regressions on the branches?
You write:
"This could be done better with the tree optimizers on tree-ssa
branch, as we won't have thrown away most of the line number
information yet."
Can we keep open this report, maybe at a lower priority?
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org writes:
> Synopsis: [3.2/3.3/3.4 regression] incorrect line numbers in warning messages when using inline functions
>
> Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->rth
> Responsible-Changed-By: rth
> Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Feb 6 00:39:25 2003
> Responsible-Changed-Why:
> .
> State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
> State-Changed-By: rth
> State-Changed-When: Thu Feb 6 00:39:25 2003
> State-Changed-Why:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-01/msg01914.html
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8602
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-request at lists dot debian dot org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster at lists dot debian dot org