This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: c/9569: 8 bytes seems to long for long long int


"Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk> writes:

> On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Neil Booth wrote:
> 
> > Could you justify that, or re-open the bug report?
> 
> Note that the bug report is actually a C++ bug report in the wrong
> category, and C++ doesn't have long long, and in the C++ compiler
> pedwarns (those that are enabled by default) are errors by default.

I still don't get it. In C99, this is perfectly legal code, and does
what the reporter wants. It is of course documented nowhere, but I
would assume that g++ inherits C99's long long semantics if long long
is enabled. Why not this part?

-- 
	Falk


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]