This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c/9569: 8 bytes seems to long for long long int
- From: Falk Hueffner <falk dot hueffner at student dot uni-tuebingen dot de>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
- Cc: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk>, <aj at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org>, <stefaandr at hotmail dot com>, <gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 06 Feb 2003 00:59:37 +0100
- Subject: Re: c/9569: 8 bytes seems to long for long long int
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0302052246090.546-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk>
"Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk> writes:
> On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Neil Booth wrote:
>
> > Could you justify that, or re-open the bug report?
>
> Note that the bug report is actually a C++ bug report in the wrong
> category, and C++ doesn't have long long, and in the C++ compiler
> pedwarns (those that are enabled by default) are errors by default.
I still don't get it. In C99, this is perfectly legal code, and does
what the reporter wants. It is of course documented nowhere, but I
would assume that g++ inherits C99's long long semantics if long long
is enabled. Why not this part?
--
Falk