This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: libstdc++/9527: gcc-3.2.1 strstreams and hidden linux glibcdependencies
- From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
- To: paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org, bkoz at redhat dot com, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org,o dot flebbe at science-computing dot de, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org,nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, o dot flebbe at science-computing dot de
- Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 09:58:00 -0600
- Subject: Re: libstdc++/9527: gcc-3.2.1 strstreams and hidden linux glibcdependencies
- References: <20030131155123.9933.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
On 31 Jan 2003 15:51:23 -0000
paolo@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
>Synopsis: gcc-3.2.1 strstreams and hidden linux glibc dependencies
>
>State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
>State-Changed-By: paolo
>State-Changed-When: Fri Jan 31 15:51:23 2003
>State-Changed-Why:
> Well, glibc2.2.5 was released more than 1 year ago:
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-announce/2002/msg00000.html
> and current distributions mostly ship with glibc2.3.x.
> I think we don't really support anything older than 2.2.5...
> Benjamin?
>
>http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9527
strstreams in general is the lowest priority of any bug on the C++
runtime. The only thing that could make it even less of a priority is a
known problem with old glibcs.
Using both, in combination, when superior solutions exist for both seems
to be asking for problems. No, begging.
:)
-benjamin