This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: libstdc++/9378: 64-bit g++: construct base:std::moneypunct_byname<char>->memory fault

From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz at redhat dot com>
To: Martin Sebor <sebor at roguewave dot com>
Cc: bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org, axiong at ca dot ibm dot com, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 20:53:54 -0600
Subject: Re: libstdc++/9378: 64-bit g++: construct base:std::moneypunct_byname<char>->memory fault
References: <20030129210511.4436.qmail@sources.redhat.com><3E38467A.4050409@roguewave.com><20030129203437.551dff0b.bkoz@redhat.com><3E3883BC.6040708@roguewave.com>

On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 18:45:32 -0700
Martin Sebor <sebor@roguewave.com> wrote:

>In fact, I would even propose that we remove the _byname ctors,
>or better yet, the entire facets from the standard ;-) (only
>half joking).

I would support any attempt to remove the _byname disasters from any future
standard (no joking.)

-benjamin

References:
- Re: libstdc++/9378: 64-bit g++: construct base:std::moneypunct_byname<char>->memory fault
  - From: bkoz
- Re: libstdc++/9378: 64-bit g++: construct base:std::moneypunct_byname<char>->memoryfault
  - From: Martin Sebor
- Re: libstdc++/9378: 64-bit g++: construct base:std::moneypunct_byname<char>->memory fault
  - From: Benjamin Kosnik
- Re: libstdc++/9378: 64-bit g++: construct base:std::moneypunct_byname<char>->memoryfault
  - From: Martin Sebor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]