This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: 3.2 && 3.3 && 3.4 REGRESSION: PR 9479
- From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- To: Gabriel Dos_Reis <gdosreis at sophia dot inria dot fr>
- Cc: Greg Schafer <gschafer at zip dot com dot au>, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, rth at redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 04:24:12 -0500
- Subject: Re: 3.2 && 3.3 && 3.4 REGRESSION: PR 9479
- References: <xajwukp63k9.fsf@perceval.inria.fr> <20030128231248.GA7881@tigers-lfs.nsw.bigpond.net.au> <15927.12564.122189.963259@charybde.inria.fr>
- Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 02:43:41AM +0100, Gabriel Dos_Reis wrote:
> | On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 10:12:22AM +0100, Gabriel Dos_Reis wrote:
> | >
> | > I uploaded 3.2.2 pre-release tarballs on the FTP server as
> | >
> | > ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gnu/snapshots/gcc-*3.2.2-20030128.*
> | >
> | > Please donwload and test them. Report problems to me and fill GNATS
> | > PRs.
> |
> | Hi
> |
> | We've discovered a release critical bug. Gcc does not correctly detect the
> | latest FSF release of binutils-2.13.2.1 which is quite an embarrasment.
> |
> | The GNATS PR is 9479
>
> I would like to have a binutils expert review the proposed patch in
> RP 9479.
The patch is correct, I even tested it on a bunch of ld --version strings
ld used to print.
Just note that while major.minor.patch.subpatch should be parsed into
non-empty ld_vers, version with 5 numbers separated by dots
should not (that's hjl's numbering and say 2.12.90.0.1 was still broken).
Jakub