This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: other/326: -L path has lower priority than built-in path
- From: bangerth at dealii dot org
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, mtsirkin at iil dot intel dot com, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 14 Jan 2003 22:54:50 -0000
- Subject: Re: other/326: -L path has lower priority than built-in path
- Reply-to: bangerth at dealii dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, mtsirkin at iil dot intel dot com, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
Synopsis: -L path has lower priority than built-in path
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Tue Jan 14 14:54:50 2003
State-Changed-Why:
Hi,
there have been many changes in the area of path handling,
in particular with the switch from static to shared
libraries, since 2.95. Do you know whether this old
problem still applies with newer versions of gcc?
Thanks
Wolfgang
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=326