This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: c++/9278: dependent type in conversion operator bug
- From: bangerth at dealii dot org
- To: dave at boost-consulting dot com, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 12 Jan 2003 23:52:22 -0000
- Subject: Re: c++/9278: dependent type in conversion operator bug
- Reply-to: bangerth at dealii dot org, dave at boost-consulting dot com, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
Synopsis: dependent type in conversion operator bug
State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Sun Jan 12 15:52:22 2003
State-Changed-Why:
Confirmed. I have no clue what the standard says, but an
indication that gcc is actually wrong may be given by the
fact that the code actually compiles when struct voidify
is having its template removed.
W.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9278