This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith)
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Cc: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, oldham at codesourcery dot com, ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
- Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 14:07:58 -0800
- Subject: Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith)
- References: <200212142145.QAA25890@caip.rutgers.edu> <or8yypualb.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <200212170531.AAA15561@caip.rutgers.edu> <or4r97diei.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <orisxmn2fv.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <oradiw3e9k.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> <20030107215515.GQ12992@redhat.com> <oru1gjo99n.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 03:12:52PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> I didn't feel like implementing all of TImode emulation in libgcc. We
> don't fully support TImode, only as little as needed to get the TFmode
> emulation to compile. It could be folded into libgcc2, for sure.
> Should it?
Ug. No. I didn't realize this was TImode support for 32-bit.
Ideally you wouldn't need TImode at all. I realize it probably
made things easier with the existing fp-bit.c.
Blah.
I suggest that these routines _not_ be exported from libgcc.so.
They only exist to support the TFmode bits.
r~