This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: post b-i-b merge report
- From: Loren James Rittle <rittle at latour dot rsch dot comm dot mot dot com>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 06:32:45 -0600 (CST)
- Subject: Re: post b-i-b merge report
- References: <200212171220.gBHCKlKl005937@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com>
- Reply-to: rittle at labs dot mot dot com
More info, FYI, in case it matters.
> i386-unknown-freebsd4.7, FSF binutils 2.13 appears to bootstrap
> post-merge fine (just completed).
Bootstrap compiler: gcc 2.95.X (as installed as system compiler)
> i386-unknown-freebsd5.0, FSF binutils 2.13.2 crashes upon first
> invocation of newly built xgcc in stage 1.
Bootstrap compiler: gcc 3.2 (as installed as system compiler)
> Aside, why do the in-core spec files look different in terms of
> existence of \n? Is that difference OK? (I'm getting a sense of deja vu.)
Ah, perhaps the difference is in the compiler version used to build
stage1 xgcc...