This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith)
- From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
- To: aoliva at redhat dot com
- Cc: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org, oldham at codesourcery dot com, ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
- Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 00:31:47 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: Irix6 long doubles implemented wrong? (27_io/ostream_inserter_arith)
- References: <200212142145.QAA25890@caip.rutgers.edu> <or8yypualb.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
> From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
>
> On Dec 14, 2002, "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu> wrote:
>
> > Does anyone have any thoughts on this? (Or better yet a fix?)
>
> I've been working on a patch that will enable us to switch to 128-bit
> long doubles on mips n32 and n64, but I still need a little bit of
> polishing and checking (I know that my current patch still doesn't
> pass long double arguments in the right registers). I expect to have
> it finished in the next few days.
Excellent! Let me know if I can be of service testing your patch.
> That said, I'm not sure it would be wise to break the gcc ABI on IRIX
> 6 by introducing this change. It's not like long double is the most
> widely used type, but still, I'm a bit concerned about changing it.
> Opinions?
Considering the current irix libc incompatibility, one cannot
currently input or output long doubles using stdio. What good is
that? :-)
I definitely support fixing the ABI, perhaps even on the 3.3 branch if
the patch is not too invasive.
Thanks,
--Kaveh
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu