This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

c++/8889: g++ 3.2.1 generates broken Qt 3.1 code


>Number:         8889
>Category:       c++
>Synopsis:       g++ 3.2.1 (also 3.2 it) miscompile Qt
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          wrong-code
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Tue Dec 10 05:36:00 PST 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Felix von Leitner
>Release:        3.2.1
>Organization:
>Environment:
System: Linux beholder 2.4.19 i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux
Architecture: i686

	
host: i686-pc-linux-gnu
build: i686-pc-linux-gnu
target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
configured with: ./configure --prefix=/usr --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-nls : (reconfigured) ./configure --prefix=/usr --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-nls
>Description:
	g++ 3.2 and 3.2.1 appear to compile Qt 3.1 OK (also the release
	candidates for Qt 3.1) but a KDE compiled against it fails.  The
	same Qt and KDE versions work with the same compiler flags when
	compiled with g++ 3.1.1 on my desktop.  Since Qt and KDE are so
	complex, I didn't want to report this, but now I compiled xca
	(http://www.hohnstaedt.de/xca.html) and it also mysteriously
	segfaulted.  It worked fine when compiled on my desktop with g++
	3.1.1, though.

	I am using glibc 2.2.5.
>How-To-Repeat:
	I hope you can repeat it by compiling Qt 3.1 and xca with the
	default compiler flags.
>Fix:
	no workaround known.
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]