This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: bootstrap/5888: [sun solaris 2.6] Bootstrap stage 2/3 comparisonfailure gcc-3.0.4


Hi
no, it doesn't happen anymore with 3.1 and 3.1.1
(and I have reported it :-) see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-05/msg02737.html).

However, I wish to recall my other suggestion again:
with "gcc -v", the compiler flags used for the bootstrap
should be reported together with the other configuration
parameters. This would not only be useful as a requirement
for bug reporting, but also in "real life" when identifying
a particular compiler build. Example: I once for test purposes
bootstrapped with -ffast-math, which naturally leads to certain
floating point anomalies in programs compiled with the resulting
compiler. Somehow, I forgot and actually used that compiler,
leading to errors very difficult to debug, especially since
gcc -v didn't show anything wrong. Also, bootstrapping options
like -O3 -mcpu=ultra etc. might be relevent when transporting
the build to another machine (pre-ultrasparc, for example).

Please let gcc -v report ALL relevant configuration parameters,
including bootstrapping options!
Arto


> 
> Old Synopsis: Bootstrap stage 2/3 comparison failure gcc-3.0.4
> New Synopsis: [sun solaris 2.6] Bootstrap stage 2/3 comparison failure gcc-3.0.4
> 
> State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
> State-Changed-By: bangerth
> State-Changed-When: Wed Nov 20 17:57:38 2002
> State-Changed-Why:
>     This is a rather old bootstrap failure. Can you please check
>     whether this still happens with newer versions of gcc and
>     report back to us what you find?
>     
>     Thanks
>       Wolfgang
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5888


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]