This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: bootstrap/5888: [sun solaris 2.6] Bootstrap stage 2/3 comparisonfailure gcc-3.0.4
- From: arto dot nirkko at dkf6 dot unibe dot ch
- To: bangerth at dealii dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 08:43:34 +0100 (MET)
- Subject: Re: bootstrap/5888: [sun solaris 2.6] Bootstrap stage 2/3 comparisonfailure gcc-3.0.4
Hi
no, it doesn't happen anymore with 3.1 and 3.1.1
(and I have reported it :-) see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-05/msg02737.html).
However, I wish to recall my other suggestion again:
with "gcc -v", the compiler flags used for the bootstrap
should be reported together with the other configuration
parameters. This would not only be useful as a requirement
for bug reporting, but also in "real life" when identifying
a particular compiler build. Example: I once for test purposes
bootstrapped with -ffast-math, which naturally leads to certain
floating point anomalies in programs compiled with the resulting
compiler. Somehow, I forgot and actually used that compiler,
leading to errors very difficult to debug, especially since
gcc -v didn't show anything wrong. Also, bootstrapping options
like -O3 -mcpu=ultra etc. might be relevent when transporting
the build to another machine (pre-ultrasparc, for example).
Please let gcc -v report ALL relevant configuration parameters,
including bootstrapping options!
Arto
>
> Old Synopsis: Bootstrap stage 2/3 comparison failure gcc-3.0.4
> New Synopsis: [sun solaris 2.6] Bootstrap stage 2/3 comparison failure gcc-3.0.4
>
> State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
> State-Changed-By: bangerth
> State-Changed-When: Wed Nov 20 17:57:38 2002
> State-Changed-Why:
> This is a rather old bootstrap failure. Can you please check
> whether this still happens with newer versions of gcc and
> report back to us what you find?
>
> Thanks
> Wolfgang
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5888