This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: SSE arguments alignment

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Cc: Ian Ollmann <iano at cco dot caltech dot edu>, hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org, bernds at redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 09:34:21 -0700
Subject: Re: SSE arguments alignment
References: <20021010192058.GE9659@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <Pine.SGI.4.40.0210101748060.14325-100000@helix2.caltech.edu> <20021011124815.GX11713@kam.mff.cuni.cz>

On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 02:48:15PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Yes, that is the bug - outgoing operands are always aligned to 32bit
> only as ia32 ABI mandates.  I am not quite sure how this should be
> hanled, as we need to increase the alignment of only SSE operands
> (probably structure containing SSE operand too, but structure containing
> other 128bit or 64bit aligned field should not get aligned).

Err, this was already handled, I thought.  Apparently not.
Bernd, did that stuff get left on a branch somewhere?


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SSE arguments alignment
  - From: Ian Ollmann
- Re: SSE arguments alignment
  - From: Bernd Schmidt

References:
- Re: optimization/8049: SSE unaligned vector stores crash with -O0
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: optimization/8049: SSE unaligned vector stores crash with -O0
  - From: Ian Ollmann
- SSE arguments alignment
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]