This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: c++/8134: ICE in force_store_init_value on legal code

From: Pop Sébastian <pop at gauvain dot u-strasbg dot fr>
To: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
Cc: lerdsuwa at gcc dot gnu dot org, alvaro at rentec dot com, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,georgeh at rentec dot com, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 00:05:38 +0200
Subject: Re: c++/8134: ICE in force_store_init_value on legal code
References: <20021004151030.2108.qmail@sources.redhat.com> <20021008213102.GB22353@gauvain.u-strasbg.fr> <m38z18d244.fsf@soliton.integrable-solutions.net>

On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 11:58:35PM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Pop Sébastian <pop@gauvain.u-strasbg.fr> writes:
> 
> | I can reproduce the bug with 
> | gcc version 3.2.1 20020924 (Debian prerelease)
> | 
> | The bug is not present in:
> | gcc version 3.0.4
> | 
> | nor in the latest version in CVS:
> | version gcc 3.3 20021007 (experimental)
> | 
> | Seems like the bug was a duplicate of another bug fixed in the mainline.
> | I suggest to close this PR.
> 
> don't you have a GNATS account?
> 
not yet...

> Can you determine which patch fixes this PR?  It would be helpful if
> it could be backported to branch,
> 
This remembers me something... in typeck2.c 
I will try to retrieve it.

> -- Gaby

References:
- Re: c++/8134: ICE in force_store_init_value on legal code
  - From: lerdsuwa
- Re: c++/8134: ICE in force_store_init_value on legal code
  - From: Pop Sébastian
- Re: c++/8134: ICE in force_store_init_value on legal code
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]