This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: target/8087: sparc-sun-solaris2.7 C testsuite failures in execute/20020720-1.c w/-m64 or on sparcv9/sparc64
- From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
- To: davem at gcc dot gnu dot org, davem at redhat dot com, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, jakub at redhat dot com, roger at eyesopen dot com, rth at redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 13:16:05 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: target/8087: sparc-sun-solaris2.7 C testsuite failures in execute/20020720-1.c w/-m64 or on sparcv9/sparc64
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0210070941130.25735-100000@www.eyesopen.com>
BTW, I think there are two problems with the XFAIL code that was
recently added. With the first hunk, you set torture_execute_xfail
and I believe the testcase fails to *compile* on those targets. (You
get the link failure when the opt doesn't occur right?) If the
testcase compiles you should never expect an execute failure.
I came to this conclusion via visual inspection not any direct
testing, but I believe you need to set torture_compile_xfail there
instead.
The second hunk for sparc -m64 looks correct, but it doesn't work for
me for some reason. See:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2002-10/msg00194.html
I'm not sure why, perhaps that one only looks for execute failures,
not compile failures? Not sure. Can you reproduce it?
--Kaveh
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu