This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

c++/7616: New warning request


>Number:         7616
>Category:       c++
>Synopsis:       New warning request
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          change-request
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Fri Aug 16 13:36:01 PDT 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Sylvain Pion
>Release:        3.3
>Organization:
>Environment:
Reading specs from ./gcc/Linux_trunc/bin/../lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.3/specs
Configured with: /u/zosma/0/prisme/spion/gcc/gcc_trunc/configure --disable-shared --disable-nls --enable-languages=c++ --prefix=/u/zosma/0/prisme/spion/gcc/Linux_trunc --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --with-as=/u/zosma/0/prisme/spion/gcc/Binutils/Linux/bin/as --with-ld=/u/zosma/0/prisme/spion/gcc/Binutils/Linux/bin/ld
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.3 20020813 (experimental)
>Description:
Compiling the code below with the SunPRO compiler gives the following warning :

"warning_request.cpp", line 6: Warning: i hides A::i.
1 Warning(s) detected.

G++ doesn't warn for this case, i.e. when the name of an argument of a member function hides a data member.
I think it would be nice to support it.
>How-To-Repeat:
struct A
{
  int i;
  void f(int i) const {}
};
>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]