This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: optimization/7120: Run once loop should always be unrolled

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at twiddle dot net>, davem at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, rusty at rustcorp dot com dot au, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 17:48:24 -0700
Subject: Re: optimization/7120: Run once loop should *always* be unrolled
References: <20020625162132.31801.qmail@sources.redhat.com> <20020626032456.GR22093@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <20020626034700.GS22093@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <20020626083210.GV22093@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <20020626105453.A18461@twiddle.net> <20020627004126.GZ22093@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au>

On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 10:11:26AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> Were you suggesting to remove the n_iterations == 2 case?

No, just didn't feel like typing it.


Patch is ok.


r~

References:
- Re: optimization/7120: Run once loop should *always* be unrolled
  - From: davem
- Re: optimization/7120: Run once loop should *always* be unrolled
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: optimization/7120: Run once loop should *always* be unrolled
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: optimization/7120: Run once loop should *always* be unrolled
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: optimization/7120: Run once loop should *always* be unrolled
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: optimization/7120: Run once loop should *always* be unrolled
  - From: Alan Modra

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: optimization/7120: Run once loop should *always* be unrolled

Re: optimization/7120: Run once loop should always be unrolled