This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: libstdc++/4436: const_reverse_iterator rend()const;
- From: paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org, tyler at tgsmc dot com
- Date: 31 May 2002 19:39:50 -0000
- Subject: Re: libstdc++/4436: const_reverse_iterator rend()const;
- Reply-to: paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org, nobody at gcc dot gnu dot org, paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org, tyler at tgsmc dot com, gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org
Synopsis: const_reverse_iterator rend()const;
Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->paolo
Responsible-Changed-By: paolo
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri May 31 12:39:49 2002
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Triaged.
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: paolo
State-Changed-When: Fri May 31 12:39:49 2002
State-Changed-Why:
Indeed, the relevant DR is #280, which however is still in
the *open* state: this means that, for the time being, the
ISO Standard holds and there is *no* requirement for
reverse_iterator to be comparable to const
reverse_iterator. In the current state of affairs, with
both libstdc++-v3 and other conforming implementations
the line 'di != d.rend();' of your testcase cannot be
compiled.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=4436