This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: cp/parse.y:2120: invalid value: $3

From: Franz Sirl <Franz dot Sirl-kernel at lauterbach dot com>
To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>,"davem at redhat dot com" <davem at redhat dot com>,"nathan at cs dot bris dot ac dot uk" <nathan at cs dot bris dot ac dot uk>,"bug-gcc at gnu dot org" <bug-gcc at gnu dot org>,"bug-bison at gnu dot org" <bug-bison at gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 17:59:05 +0200
Subject: Re: cp/parse.y:2120: invalid value: $3
References: <9020000.1020125193@warlock.codesourcery.com><200204292322.g3TNM0R00942@shade.twinsun.com><9020000.1020125193@warlock.codesourcery.com>

At 17:36 30.04.2002, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >>>>> "Mark" == Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:
>
> > --On Monday, April 29, 2002 04:22:00 PM -0700 Paul Eggert
> > <eggert@twinsun.com> wrote:
>
> >> OK, but here is a more conservative patch that also avoids the dirty
> >> hack.  This patch avoids grammar rule duplication and should be a bit
> >> easier to maintain.
>
> > Nathan, would you apply this patch to branch and mainline, please?
>
>Er, it may be easier to maintain, but it also breaks the compiler.  With
>this patch, libstdc++ fails to build on the branch using bison 1.28.

And bison-1.35 (tested on the same machine after upgrading bison).

Franz.

References:
- Re: cp/parse.y:2120: invalid value: $3
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: cp/parse.y:2120: invalid value: $3
  - From: Paul Eggert
- Re: cp/parse.y:2120: invalid value: $3
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]