This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: libstdc++/5095: broken $(MAKEFLAGS)
- From: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>
- To: "Golubev I. N." <gin at mo dot msk dot ru>
- Cc: gcc-gnats at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 01:17:23 -0400
- Subject: Re: libstdc++/5095: broken $(MAKEFLAGS)
- References: <20020410170759.21034.qmail@sources.redhat.com> <048e3cb9a32796-gin@mo.msk.ru>
On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 03:41:28PM +0000, Golubev I. N. wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2001 18:32:00 (GMT) I wrote to gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org in
> <01e43c18f42036-gin@mo.msk.ru>:
>
> > My apologies. That happens only if
> >
> > MAKEOVERRIDES =
> >
> > line is removed from `libstdc++-v3/Makefile', which does not normally
> > happen with gcc.
>
> It should be displayed in list archive as a followup to original
> report, but it looks like it is not. How do I ensure that in future?
Make certain that gcc-gnats is in the To:/Cc: header, and that the PR
number (libstdc++/5095) is in the Subject: header. Then it will be
appended automatically.
> The real problem is that "trying to override a makefile variable gets
> tricky when recursing". Current gcc configuration scripts constantly
> lack something essential for one's favorite system, and overriding
> makefile variables is often required. Documenting ways to do it is
> absolutely necessary.
Unfortunately no two libraries are the same. Patches welcome.
--
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace. We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. - Samuel Adams